On (Black) Nationalist Presidents

I mistakenly stumbled into the bad side of the internet today when I clicked on Steve Sailer’s name in a comment thread. For those who have been blissfully ignorant of his recent musings hack job: Michelle Obama is stupid, a clear beneficiary of affirmative action, and hates white people. It’s real hardhitting journalism.

This is one of those cases where repeating the evidence is enough to refute the conclusions. Michelle Obama:

  • attended Princeton and Harvard while being black.
  • made some grammatical mistakes in an undergraduate thesis.
  • passed the Illinois bar at a non-standard time.
  • wrote about race and identity in academia.

Sailer boldly extrapolates from here that she is “semi-literate,” failed the bar exam the first time, and “will never forgive white America for what she had to suffer.” He then leaves it as an exercise to his readers to draw connections between his attack on Michelle Obama and black people’s relative lack of intelligence, the horrors of affirmative action for the white folk, and the possibility of Obama as the stealth black power candidate. (And they don’t disappoint! The comments to these posts are classic.)

These points should all be obvious, but let’s go through the motions anyway:

  • You can’t draw any conclusions from a college paper, especially an undergraduate thesis, which despite the fancy title tend to be less important, less harshly-graded works that focus on synthesizing one’s educational experience, rather than research or persuasion.
  • If on one side we have Princeton’s and Harvard’s judgment of academic merit and the other one paper, there’s not really a dispute. Using the specter of “affirmative action” to completely discount the former creates an impossible standard for black people — no matter what degree or job they receive, a single less than flattering counterexample is enough to qualify them as stupid. How is this not racist?
  • There are lots of reasons to delay taking the bar, and regardless, taking two tries does not suddenly make a lawyer stupid. But this is a nice cheap shot.
  • Finally, few have a rigorously developed belief set as an undergrad, and instead try on different ideologies for size. I’ve once gave a speech about the cop-out society that I would like to disappear. But there it is, waiting to embarrass me in a future Democratic primary. There’s a reason the presidential election does not focus on what candidates did when they were 21; it’s retarded.

But Sailer’s real argument is not about Michelle Obama’s intelligence — that’s just red meat for the bell curve crowd — it’s that the Obama’s are secret race-warriors who should strike fear into the hearts of White America. After all, Michelle has a huge racial chip on her shoulder — isn’t it OBVIOUS from her writings?

In reality, she expresses what should be uncontroversial: privileged black folk have to deal with competing identities, and there’s a tension between integrating with the white mainstream and remaining part of the black community. And Obama’s sentiment is similarly shocking: she wants to make sure that the benefits of her education make it back to her worse-off community. Now if you conceive of races as existing in zero-sum competition with each other, this this is dangerous stuff because it means that your aryan brothers will be losing out. If you take a more “I am not free until the last of my brothers is free” approach — and also note that a “pro-black” agenda would not mean Jim Crow laws for white people, but rather a more social democratic state that would benefit everyone — not so scary.

Of course, this is another way of saying that the thesis paper is scandalous to precisely the degree that you are a conservative motivated by racial resentment. So maybe Steve will have some success fighting the conservatives-for-Obama phenomena. However, I’m going to choose to think better of my right-wing brethren — they’ll see this for the despicable attack that it is, and move on.

5 comments to On (Black) Nationalist Presidents

  • Abe

    I read Sailer’s blog (I’m sick that way) and agree with your points. You may have read one of my comments where I mentioned that for quite some time Sailer was complaining and whining that Princeton was blocking Michelle’s thesis, but once it was released he complained that Obama is behind the release and did it to embarrass his wife. One of his fans says in response that since Sailer is entertaining he should get to have things both ways.

    Btw, if you read The National Review–especially their blog–watch out for a writer named John Derbyshire. He is Sailer’s biggest promoter.

  • There is a twisted pleasure to be had in checking out the blogs of Sailer & Co. — and next time I’m in the mood I will look for Derbyshire at NRO as I imagine his writing will be a prize.

    Good point on how there was no way for Obama to ‘win’ this exchange in Sailer’s eyes; he was doomed to be either a secretive fascist or a ruthless opportunist. Very. Aggravating.

  • I enjoyed reading this a lot and I really hope to read more of your posts in the future, so I’ve bookmarked your blog. But I couldn’t just bookmark it, oh no.. When I see quality website’s like this one, I like to share it with others So I’ve created a backlink to your site (from my website, and don’t worry it is a do-follow one) you can see it here if you want to: http://www.boredkillers.com/siteswelike.php Anyways I hope you keep up the fantastic work!

  • Avoid utilization of beverages containing caffeine and alcohol.
    Its massive amount varieties and colors available in the market
    is satisfying the demand of people. The last and the majority affordable quality vaporizer around the market that I
    would recommend is termed the Magic Flight Launch Box.

  • in a meeting that he knows the conampy will receive part of the stimulus money. The conampy is are based out of San Gatos, California, and has been in business for over 20 years. It has just expanded into Southern California. It’s one of the “energy efficiency” companies has just recently expanded to Southern California, and all those companies are planning to hire and expand. (I met new hires who jumped over from other similar companies because my conampy paid better; and they told me those other companies are also hiring because they will be getting their cuts of the stimulus money as well.)Personally, I don’t particularly believe in energy efficiency, global warming or saving the planet. But hey, a job is job, and it’s a great job. I’ve been underemployed and under financial stress for too long. Right now I’m just happy that I’ve finally found something. I suppose I have Obama and his stimulus bill to thank for.In my first conampy meeting, the president of the conampy told us to refer our friends to the conampy because we are hiring. If I refer a friend who gets hired, I’ll even get a sizable referral bonus! The president seems optimistic because he’s getting the stimulus money. And I’m certainly happy and VERY VERY thankful because I have a job that pays well.So, at least on a personal level, I know that the stimulus is working… for me and my friends (whom I’m about to refer into the business.) For me personally, the stimulus has created jobs, for me and my friends.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>