Damage is a feature not a bug

Disaster porn for engineers:

YouTube Preview Image

This seemed like a good opportunity to point out that while that video makes the damage look pretty bad and cause youtube commenters to call for the designers heads, this is an example of a building behaving well.  The concrete outside the wall rebar cage spalled off, which looks like failure, but is predictable and intentional – you need a layer of concrete outside the cage for corrosion protection that you plan on being sacrificed during an earthquake.  The rest of the wall remained confined and was able to cycle through major inelastic deformations to dissipate energy and prevent the rest of the building from collapsing.  They were so effective that the owners are planning on repairing the damaged shear walls and finishes and reopening, which is pretty impressive.

2 comments to Damage is a feature not a bug

  • Monshee L. R.

    Let’s stop fighting about this!

    You are stupid Quixote!

    If you are not objective than you are not a critical thinker!

    -Stop being an ass Quixot, try QuixNOT!

  • Definitely believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the web the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people consider worries that they plainly don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>